March 18, 2014
By Saeed Qureshi
Barring providential intervention, apparently Pakistan’s former
strong man and president Musharraf is in deep waters. Justice Faisal Arab the
head of the special court seems to be poised to send Musharraf either to
gallows or long imprisonment for high treason charge. Musharraf’s decision to
return to Pakistan was entirely ill-conceived.
Somehow he misjudged that in the
eventuality of judicial proceedings against him, he would come out of the legal
battle with flying colors. He brushed aside the horrific fact that he had
countless enemies mostly the religious fanatical saber rattlers and even the
vicious political rank and file.
The dismal situation in which Pervez Musharraf is caught
reminds me of a Pashto couplet that eloquently echoes horrendous challenges Musharraf
is faced with. It says, “I do not know what to do and where to escape. All
round I am surrounded by thousands of enemies”. He would not have imagined that
not to speak of participating in the elections, the government in power would
be headed by his staunchest foe Mian Nawaz Sharif.
Logically why would Main Sahib brook an iota
of compassion for a person who somehow is responsible for his humiliating expulsion
from power for almost a decade? It is tacitly the most opportune time for Nawaz
Sharif to go for a tit for tat hunt. He is a typical Punjabi and Punjabi ethos
invariably returns the compliment the way it is received. “You got me out of
power and you will have to pay for that call grievously” is the mindset of
Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif.
Musharraf’s attorneys are baffled and look like blunt
weapons. And my reckoning is that the army will not meddle into an affair that cannot
impinge upon its self esteem or pride. There seem to be not enough grounds for
the army to intervene and assert its domination over the established democratic
order revived after a great deal of hassle and crises.
It is to be watched if General Musharraf would appear in the
special court on March 31.The court directed the government to arrest and
produce Musharraf if he refuses to appear before it on his own. Akram Sheikh, the
head of the “prosecution team proposed indictment of Gen Musharraf through his
counsels in which the physical presence of the accused was not required”.
That
quirk plea was rejected by Anwar Mansoor Khan, the defense lawyer to indict Gen
Musharraf through his counsels. Mr. Khan contended that “such a procedure was
alien to the criminal law”.
In the latest plea filed before the trial court on behalf of
Musharraf, the former president has implicated his erstwhile officers as
co-conspirators for the imposition of Emergency on Nov 3, 2007. That is
purportedly, a judicial standpoint and it devolves upon the trial court to
accept or reject it.
If this plea is accepted then the case could drag for an unspecified
period of time. In that situation it could open new dimensions that would
necessitate hearing of all the persons pointed out as conspirators, by Musharraf
and his team of judicial defenders.
Musharraf has maintained that he imposed the Emergency after consulting the
then prime minister, the governors of all four provinces and the Chairman of
the Joint Chiefs of Staff Committee, the chiefs of the armed forces, the
vice-chief of army staff and the corps commanders of the Pakistan Army.
His
claim may also involve his political cohorts who in this scenario could be
stalwarts from PMLQ and even MQM. There is a possibility that the former high
profile army officers could debunk this claim of Musharraf.
Yet tragically this is not the only monstrous case against
Musharraf in the court of Law. There is another pending case against him: the
alleged murder of Baloch leader Nawab Akbar Khan Bugti. A Pakistani
anti-terrorism court based in Quetta,
issued warrants for the arrest of two guarantors of Pervez Musharraf
over his failure to appear before it in a murder case. The proverb is true in
case of Musharraf that “tribulations never come alone: these come in droves”.
The bare and yawning fact is that even if Musharraf is
exonerated of all the cases, he would never be a free man to stalk and walk in
the land of Pakistan. He will remain confined to his mansion. His political
ambitions would be absolutely hindered for dire security reasons. The Baloch
and the religious militants would always be after his life.
It is such an
agonizing situation for a person who otherwise, has done a lot better for the
people of Pakistan than politicians in liberalizing the society and adopting a
generous approach and policy towards media, both print and electronic.
As for supporting America in the war on terrorism: did he
have choice? The answer is emphatically in negative. The stark reality is that
Pakistan would have been penalized with vengeance in many ways by America and
that could have spelled disaster for Pakistan. It was not a bad option for
Pakistan siding with the American and NATO forces against a band of terrorists
who were neither friends of American nor that of Pakistan.
American aid and
support by way of Kerry-Lugar financial Bill granting 7.5 billion dollars to
Pakistan as non-military aid from the period of 2010 to 2014 was a huge
economic relief for Pakistan. It was indeed a blessing not in disguise but a candid
windfall. Although the bill was passed in 2009 when Musharraf was no more in
power, yet this aid was the result of his cooperation and maneuvers with the
United States.
You are spot on saying “As for supporting America in the war on terrorism: did he (Musharraf) have choice? The answer is emphatically in negative.” I endorse Musharraf 100% on that.
ReplyDeleteShould Musharraf be put on trial and face justice? I couldn't endorse that more than the Attorney General. He certainly deserves punishment of some form, more for his megalomaniac arrogance than anything else.