May 16, 2015
By Saeed Qureshi
Amazingly
since last year (starting from Dharnas (sit-in) in the federal capital of
Pakistan, the chairman of PTI Imran Khan has at least graduated, with flying
colors, in the art of public speaking. He has attained the knack of oration
that reminds us the Mark Antony’s funeral oration on the death of his friend
Roman dictator Julius Caesar written by William Shakespeare in his play “Julius
Caesar”.
That was
a diversion from my main burden of pointing out that in the heat and exuberance
of instilling his assertions in the minds of his audience, this freshly glowing
star on the political horizon of Pakistan sets aside the element of objectivity
and goes whole-hog in lambasting his political opponents even for their
positive achievements.
I refer
to his public address delivered in Multan this Friday; the home town of his
senior party member Shah Mahmood Qureshi. In that hugely attended gathering
Imran Khan has denounced such projects as Metro Bus of Lahore and Rawalpindi ,
the Green Train ( now operational between Islamabad and Karachi), underpasses
and interstate highways arguing that a country cannot move forward by creating
such infrastructure.
The
“Green Train” service equipped with most modern facilities including the free
meals was inaugurated by Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif on May 15. It would cover
the one way distance between Islamabad and Karachi in 22 hours.
Imran
Khan alleged that huge projects were being launched primarily for commissions
and monetary kickbacks that the rulers would reap. He was mainly targeting PMLN
government. He suggested that the billions of rupees being spent on creating
and modernizing the logistics, roads and highways network system should instead
be spent on health and education and by giving loans to the farmers.
The PTI
chief particularly slated the government for the Lahore Metrobus project worth
Rs. 60 billion, suggesting that this amount should have been given to the poor
farmers. He outlined a litany of the projects that he thinks should be accorded
priority. Let me add that he should demand for abolition of morbid feudalism so
that peasants and tillers assume the ownership of lands on which they work as
slave farm labor.
Now in
all fairness, the fast and adequate communication network is the backbone of
any country’s progress and ensuing prosperity. If the tillers and peasants
cannot mobilize their produce to the cities and markets well in time, how could
they get the returns to pay their loans and continue their agricultural
activities?
The
interstate highways between the cities and access roads within cities with
multiple lanes facilitate the mobility of both goods and travelers and thus
enhance the socio-economic activity adding to the income of the people and
wealth of the state and provinces by way of more taxation.
Let me
emphasize that the secret of the rapid and sustained economic advancement of
the Western Europe and in North America is due to a comprehensive network of
the interstate highways connecting all the major cities. The Chinese Interstate
road network is the largest in the world followed by the United States. The
American highway network has been developed at a cost of some 500 billion
dollars until 2006 and covers a length of 180000 kilometers.
It is foregone
that the strength and resilience of the United States economy and that of
Western Europe lies in their fast moving roads and highways. In Pakistan or any
third world country it is arduous and time consuming even for the children to
reach schools and colleges, for the patients to be in the hospitals without
loss of time and so on.
Fast and
widespread roads and railway network is the backbone of any country’s economic
strength as manifested in the fast developing and developed countries. I have
seen in Europe particularly in Germany and Austria, the finest trains and road
system where the trains arrive at destinations right on time.
Way back
in 80s in the socialist countries where I was posted in the embassy I saw the
buses with automatic doors and electronic signs of stops and destinations. Does
Pakistan, after several decades have a well coordinated and centrally
controlled taxi, buses or railway system? Our roads are narrow heaps of filth
with horse-driven carts and ramshackle buses gushing out lethal fumes.
In the
United States there is a trucking system which is marvel of the present times.
Countless wide bodied trucks carry goods and merchandise between destinations
round the clock. From the border country Mexico every day some 500 trucks enter
United States with all kinds of farm produce and manufactured products.
Do we in Pakistan have such trucks and goods transportation system? Our
trucks are small sized, clumsily driven by private owners without caring the
road rules.
Because
of the narrow and overcrowded roads and no mention-able inter cities highways
except a few, the accidents are common and frequent in Pakistan. The movement
of cotton, Sugarcane, wheat, corn, vegetables, milk and other articles from
countryside to the urban factories and shopping centers is an uphill task and
causes delays and is prone to bottlenecks and risky driving.
We ought
to give credit and appreciation to Mian Nawaz Sharif for building, during his
previous tenures, the highway between Rawalpindi and Lahore (M-2) that since
1997 has brought about a sea change in the movements of both passengers and
goods. It used to be a narrow strip causing quite a few hours to travel between
Rawalpindi and Lahore. M-1 linking Rawalpindi and Peshawar was completed during
president Musharraf’s time and is operational since 2007.
The
Punjab government should be given generous credit for broadening the link road
between Murree and Rawalpindi. The Metro bus system for traveling between
Rawalpindi and Islamabad should be felicitated and lauded.
When completed
sometime this year it would transform the narrow strip called Murree road
(legacy of the British) into a spacious multi lanes Metrobus saving time and
botheration of the passengers traveling to and from Islamabad. The
Islamabad-Rawalpindi Metrobus is the second project after Lahore Metrobus that
brought enormous facility to the citizens of Lahore.
The
question is why our leaders are so self-centered and harbor chronic bias and
narrow vision simply for scoring points and misleading the people and shirk
away from appreciating the good and monumental services like widening and
building of roads and railway tracks.
They
should have the broad-mindedness and national outlook to applaud what was being
done in the interest of the country and denounce that is not being done. A
tendency of merely looking for faults is not only imprudent but rebounds
against the critics.
No comments:
Post a Comment