September 3, 2015
By Saeed
Qureshi
On September
2 president Obama secured enough Democratic Party votes “to prevent a resolution of
disapproval of the Iran’s nuclear deal”. This development is being termed as president
Obama’s victory against the Republicans who are irreconcilably opposed to the
deal and want it to be rescinded.
The swing of nearly 8 democrats came after
their dialogue with senior diplomats from Britain, China, France,
Germany and Russia who categorically told their American
counterparts that “their nuclear agreement with Iran was the best they could
expect and the five world powers had no intention of returning to the
negotiating table.”
President Obama was instrumental in the signing
of a comprehensive agreement (JCPOA) on the nuclear program of Iran between
Iran and the five permanent members of Security Council (United States, Russia,
China, France, United Kingdom) plus Germany and the European Union. It was
inked in Vienna on 14 July 2015.
But
more daunting challenge for president Obama and the Democratic Party was to win
support for it at home turf. President Obama surmounted both these hurdles with
amazing success which would bind Iran to not fabricate an atomic weapon and stop
or scale down its nuclear wherewithal for making an atomic bomb. In return the
debilitating economic and trade sanctions and stifling embargoes on Iran would
be gradually lifted.
Although Israel and Saudi Arabia
were on the same page in opposing the nuclear deal for different reasons yet
the United States and the five leading world powers ignored the concerns or
opposition of both these countries for a more sublime outcome which was to draw
commitment from Iran and subject her to stringent conditions from further
bolstering her nuclear know how for an ultimate goal of making an atom bomb.
It
is impossible for Iran to wriggle out of that treaty and surreptitiously keep
advancing her nuclear capability as sanctions and embargoes could be
instantaneously re-imposed. Iran in that situation would be rendered a pariah
state and isolated from the rest of the world.
Israel
should be doubly felicitated and satisfied that she would be immune from a dreaded possibility of Iran
making a nuclear warhead that if used could decimate Israel and erase her from
the surface of the earth although in that dreadful cataclysmic situation Iran would
also suffer an irretrievable annihilation for ages.
It is heartening that better sense
has prevailed both on Iran and big powers including United States to broker and
finalize a deal that saved the world from an unimaginable catastrophe inflicted
either by Iranian nuclear bombs or even that of Israel of the United States in
retaliation.
In a
broader perspective the world could witness another atomic nightmare after the destruction
of Japanese cities namely Hiroshima and Nagasaki during the second world by United
States by dropping atom bombs. And those bombs were much smaller and fabricated
from a primitive nuclear technology.
President
Obama’s historic and watershed accomplishment in finalizing the nuclear deal
between Iran and the western powers plus United States ought to be reciprocated
by Iran through an expression of goodwill and friendship.
The Iranian Nuclear
deal can be utilized for opening a new chapter of cordiality and mutually
fruitful friendship between the two countries which have been the closest and
most fraternal allies before the advent of the Ayatollahs’ Islamic regime in
January 1979.
Americans must understand that Iran has the potential of being a
far more useful ally of the United States than Israel. Israel has always been a
liability for United States while Iran can be an asset.
The lifting of economic and trade
sanctions on Iran would help revive her mauled economy and open her to the
outside side world. The Iranian oil once again would start flowing into the
international markets and could stabilize the oil and gas price worldwide. The
United States can import Iranian oil and gas on much competitive prices.
Yet a redeeming feature and outcome
of this remarkable deal possibly could be that the Ayatollahs’ regime scale
down its fanatic exuberance towards United States and in due course a moderate
and even a democratic political set up could come up.
The Iranian people could
also travel and interact with the rest of the world with the lifting of the
international and domestic restrictions on traveling. Thus the Iranians closed
and dogmatic society may open to the outside world.
The
world would be a better place if peace can be restored in conflict ridden
regions of the Middle East and Afghanistan. Iran can play a crucial role in brokering
peace in the troubled Middle East as well in Afghanistan where a sizable
number of Shias live. Iranian leverage in Iraq and Syria and Lebanon can be
hugely instrumental in dousing the leaping fires of unrest and bloody conflicts
now raging for over a decade or so.
With
her trained army of about one million fighters Iran can be extremely useful for
warring parties fighting against the ISIS in the Middle East and may be helpful
to turn the tide against the rebel Islamic militants. Iran can also rein in
Hezbollah in Lebanon for toning down their hostility towards Israel.
Iran has
enormous influence in the Central Asia’s caucuses or the liberated countries
beyond Afghanistan. For durable peace in Afghanistan the inevitability of Iran
cannot be blinked away. Pakistan and Afghanistan alone cannot bring about a
lasting peace and the advent of a new era of reconstruction in Afghanistan
without the involvement of a powerful regional power Iran.
The Central Asian
states would also enormously benefit from a relationship of friendship between
Iran and the United States for their reconstruction and tapping of hidden
natural resources.
The
Uzbek and Tajik mostly allied to Iran by virtue of common Shia faith had been
a formidable part of the anti-NATO and anti-west forces in Afghanistan. Their
sizable number is also part of the Taliban still at war with the foreign forces
stationed in Afghanistan: the bulk of which come from the United States. Iran
can help in ending the insurgency and incursions of the Uzbek and Tajik
insurgents and that would be a big step towards diminishing civil war in
Afghanistan.
No comments:
Post a Comment