April
25, 2016
By
Saeed Qureshi
Those who
believe that Saudi Arabia has an Islamic system of government are either
mistaken or ill-informed. It is outright a monarchy or kingdom that runs
counter to the concept of an Islamic state. Even its name is “Kingdom of Saudi
Arabia” missing the world Islamic as we can find in the official name of
Pakistan and some other countries. Islam ordains that a caliph as head of an
Islamic government is to be chosen by the pious community notables.
A caliph
or head of Islamic state is obligated to administer the state affairs with a
group of consultants having immaculate character. That system if magnified
comes closer to the democratic form of governance of the present times.
Religiously, Saudi government is a family dynasty and professes a typical
Wahabi or Salafi brand of Islam founded by an eighteenth-century preacher and scholar Muhammad Abdal Wahhab.
The
Islamic State of Medina (622 A. C.) founded by prophet Hazrat Muhammad (SAW)
and later carried forward by four of his illustrious successors or caliphs offers
a veritable and original model of Islam. It survived only for 29 years (632-661
C. E.) Thereafter, it was converted into hereditary monarchy although the head
of state was still called a Caliph.
The
personal lives of prophet and his associates were austere, simple and pious.
They wore simple dresses, ate simple food and did not amass money. They
dispensed justice in true sense. They were accountable to the community. They
drew stipend from the Baitul-Maul (Islamic treasury) hardly enough for their
barest minimum living.
The
Islamic authoritarian empire that began with the assassination of the fourth Rashideen
caliph Hazrat Ali in 621 C. E, cleared the way for the rival Amir Muawiyah to
lay the foundation of the dynasty of Umayyad clan(662-743 C.E. ). The Omayyad
were succeeded by Abbasid (750-861 C. E.) and later by a string of other
similar Islamic empires (868-1924 C. E.). But essentially most of these regimes
professing to be Islamic were oppressive brutal, family dynasties that survived
as long they could hold on to power by sword and military muscle.
The
Omayyad converted the pristine Khilafat-e- Rashida into hereditary succession
or a form of government that was akin to the Byzantine, Roman or Persian
empires. Such autocratic Islamic empires continued for several hundred years in
some form or another.
The Ottoman
Islamic Empire (1299-1924 C. E.) also ruled over most of the Arab lands
including Saudi Arabia. In March 1924, Kamal Ataturk ended the Ottoman Empire,
abolished the caliphate and exiled the last Ottoman caliph Abdul Majid- II
(second) and founded modern Turkey. It
was a defining phase of Turkish history as it marked the end of the
religio-political Islamic empires that had begun with the establishment of the Umayyad
absolutist Islamic dynasty in 622 C. E.
The story
of Saudi Arabia, however, is different and needs elaboration. The first Saudi state was established in the year
1744 C. E. (1157 A.H.) following an alliance between Imam Muhammad
ibn Abdal-Wahab (religious reformer of Salafi or Wahabi sect) and the
ruler Prince Muhammad ibn Saud. Thereafter the Saudi dynasty
decreed the observance of Wahabi or Salafi creed of Islam in Saudi Arabia.
As
mentioned above under this Islamic system, such practices believed to be
anti-Tauhid (oneness of God) were abolished and that abolishment is still
rigidly enforced in Saudi Arabia. These practices inter alia seek solicitation of saints both dead and alive against
sufferings and bad luck etc. The Wahabi religious doctrine prohibits various
customs and beliefs such as visiting and venerating tombs, monuments,
graveyards, saints, mystics, deities and spirits. It also decrees as sin to
sanctify trees, caves, stones and similar other places.
In line with the Wahabi theology, the Saudi government has
leveled off ancient graveyards where the companions of the prophets and other
Islamic icons were buried. The kissing or touching of the outer wall or grill
of the prophet’s tomb is forbidden. The diverse customs and traditions that are
observed by various Sunni sects as Brelvis Chishtia, Qadria, Naqshbandia etc.
and also the mainstream Shia sect are sternly disallowed as being Unislamic.
Implementing the Wahhabi Islam may not be objectionable
because, paradoxically, in Iran there is Shia faith that is markedly opposed to
the beliefs of various denominations falling under the Sunni category. Rather
to uphold the concept of Tauhid is plausible and that is what Islam stands for
against idolatry and human shamans (spiritual healers).
Islam exhorts that the Muslims around the world, irrespective
of their region, color or ethnicity are one nation with God as the head. In
Saudi Arabia there is acute distrust and discrimination about the Muslims from
other countries. No external Muslim can settle in Saudi Arabia. The prevailing
Saudi political system manifests violation of Islamic faith in terms of being
dictatorial and authoritarian. This system suppresses human rights and dignity
and discards a civil society.
It concentrates power and wealth in a few hands. In this
system there is no accountability through courts and national institutions. In
Saudi Arabia, the royal family, sheikhs or heads of tribes are above law. The
caliph was answerable in the state of Medina. Now he is a monarch and to
criticize him or the royal family is a crime. The freedom of expression is
unheard in Saudi Arabia and it is stifled forcefully.
The House
of Saud is the ruling royal family of Saudi Arabia for
nearly three centuries. The major portion of oil income that runs into billions
every year is distributed among the royal family members. Almost all the royal
members are literally sitting on mounds of wealth. They have their private
banks, their private jets, luxury villas and palaces in fun cities around the
world. Their lavish, regal and extravagant life style defies description and
looks like a sheer mockery of the sublime teachings of Islam as practiced by
the founder and early disciples.
Saudi
Arabia, the abode of Islam has been turned into feudal, tribal and family
fiefdom. No one can oppose this loathsome system of monarchy that survives on
the accumulation of national wealth in private hands and servitude of its
citizens. The land, wealth and resources of Saudi Arabia belong to the people
and not 15000 members of the royal family with 2000 as the elite and notables among
them.
The
religious scholars in other Muslim countries decry the Unislamic practices and
sinful way of life in their societies but do not censure the Saudi rulers who
have usurped power, pelf and wealth and at the same time call themselves as the
custodians of Islam or the two holiest mosques: one in Mecca (Kaaba) and the
other in Medina. It is a sheer travesty of Islam that judges the faithful by
the level of piety and rectitude and not by their social, political and
financial standing. Saudi imperial lords have kept the society backward and
enslaved so that there is no challenge to their dynastic hold on power.
The Saudi
people live under an orthodox and oppressive system that stifles freedom of
expression, blocks modern education and emancipation of women. The
conservatism and obscurantism has engulfed that society. The people cannot
agitate or protest due to fear of state brutality or else because of lack of
realization that they live in subjugation. They cannot form associations for
the protections of their rights.
Mutaween or the religious police is the most dreaded
outfit whose task is to enforcing Sharia as defined by the government,
specifically by the Committee for the Promotion of Virtue and the Prevention of
Vice (CPVPV). They had the authority to flog the violators. Mercifully in April this year the Saudi
Arabian cabinet removed the Mutaween power to arrest and limited their power to
the role of reporting violators to police or drug squad officers.
During
Khilafat-e-Rashida the ordinary Muslims were free to question the caliphs for
their anomalies. Such a question was asked from the second caliph Hazrat Umar
by a commoner about the larger size of sheet he was wearing. The ruling royal
Saudi family is above any censure of their policies and ownership of national
assets and oil revenues.
I shall
reproduce below a compelling quotation from Wikipedia that so vividly portrays
the mammoth wealth owned by the Royal family members.
“The sharing of family wealth has been a critical component
in maintaining the semblance of a united front within the royal family. An
essential part of family wealth is the Kingdom in its physical entirety, which
the Al Saud view as a totally owned family asset. Whether through the
co-mingling of personal and state funds from lucrative government positions,
huge land allocations, direct allotments of crude oil to sell in the open
market, segmental controls in the economy, special preferences for the award of
major contracts, outright cash handouts, and astronomical monthly
allowances—all billed to the national exchequer—all told, the financial impact
may have exceeded 40% of the Kingdom's annual budget during the reign of King
Fahd.”
“Over decades of oil revenue-generated expansion, estimates
of royal net worth is at well over $1.4 trillion. This method of wealth
distribution has allowed many of the senior princes and princesses to
accumulate largely unauditable wealth and, in turn, pay out, in cash or kind,
to lesser royals and commoners, and thereby gaining political influence through
their own largesse”.
In a nutshell the Saudi kingdom is Islamic in name but in
practice is clannish dictatorship. The Saudi rulers are averse to democratic
institutions, detest religious pluralism, abhor civil society, bar mass
education, suppress dissent and keep the society socially and intellectually
retrogressive. It is patriarchal government that is at the helm without
elections, parliament, independent judiciary and free media.
As Islam
enjoins, in Saudi Arabia there is no elected Majlis-e-Shoora consisting of
acknowledged pious and austere people. It looks like a medieval dynasty still
embedded in the tribal mold. Saudi Arabia is alienated from it s own people and
the rest of the world for not being an enlightened modern Islamic state.
No comments:
Post a Comment